I was on a day trip with some friends, one of them being female. She was complaining about how women only make a certain amount of money on the dollar compared to men, how women get passed up for promotions over men. Then I started thinking how that wasn’t so bad compared to what women can do that men can’t.
Women don’t have to shave their faces.
The majority of women who lose their hair and to the extent they lose it compared to men is relatively small.
Women can have multiple orgasms.
Women can fake orgasms.
In porno movies women don’t have to show their orgasms.
Women don’t have to worry about impotence.
Women don’t get embarrassing erections.
Women don’t have to worry about premature ejaculation.
Women are not made fun of if they can’t sexually perform.
Women live longer then men.
I’ve never heard of a woman dying in bed from a heart attack during sex.
Women can go to the bathroom in pairs or more and not looked at as being strange.
Women can feed babies with their breasts.
Women are allowed to change their minds.
It’s not polite to ask a women’s age or weight.
Women are allowed to get mad if someone leaves the toilet seat up.
Women don’t have to worry about circumcision.
Woemn can wear makeup to look nice or cover an imperfection.
Women are always trying to prove to themselves they’re still attractive.
Women don’t reach their sexual peak until their thirties.
It’s acceptable for an older woman to date a younger man.
Women can greet each other with a kiss.
Women are not made fun of and/or compared for the lack of size of their sex organs.
A woman can shave her pubic hair, admit she masturbates, have a lesbian affair and still be looked at as normal.
They make sex toys and lingerie for women.
Women urinate and orgasm from two different places.
It’s acceptable for women to have cosmetic surgery.
So you see some of the advantages of being a woman. Physically, biologically and sexually they are superhuman beings and I’m surprised they have not been treated that way from the start.
Friday, January 21, 2011
Personal Ads: Are They For Real? by Eddy Dio
Just another scheme in the singles game. I've answered my fair share of them but few have actually panned out. After calling them, they say they're going to call you back, but do they ever? Maybe one in a million, if that. It's always me pursuing them, calling them back, leaving messages that never get returned. Most single men can relate to that.
Women say they don't want anyone who plays games but they're the ones playing the games: chasing them, leaving messages, no return phone calls. You get the picture. And they wonder why they're alone or haven't found the right type. That's because they don't give a guy the chance to get to know them and that's because they don't answer the responses to their ads. Stretching the truth or all-out lying is part of the territory in personal ads because now they are online. It's just a bunch of words on a website and a photo. Whether or not the photo is of them or what they really look like, presently, and not many years ago, is debatable.
One time, I answered an ad and the lady said she was a certain age, didn't say anything about having children, and was voluptuous but not overweight. When I talked to her, she slowly revealed the opposing truth. I finally met her in person. Yes, she was overweight but that wasn't a problem, the fact that she lied to me was a problem. I mean the ad was deceiving, she lied from the get go. Not only that, initially, I had to call her repeatedly before she called me back.
If you're going to place a personal ad, shouldn't you be as honest as possible for the best response? If you're overweight then maybe you should put that in your ad as well as if you have children, your height, if you're a smoker or a drinker. If you do that, being honest, I mean, no one will be discouraged.
Certainly, it's disappointing when you read these ads and you can't answer them, because you can't measure up to the strict requirements. Few of us can. Lying only gets the wrong response. Honesty keeps those from responding who aren't interested in someone with children, is overweight, smokes, drinks, etc., and those who are do respond.
Personal ads requiring perfection are doomed from the onset. Here's an example: MUST have a full head of hair (which I do not have), MUST be tall, 5' 11" or taller (I'm only 5'6"), MUST be muscular, athletic, (1 have a slight build), MUST be a doctor, lawyer, policeman (I'm not even close), MUST be between a certain age (I'm either too young or too old), MUST like going to clubs ([ don't like the bar scene at all), MUST be a certain weight, etc.. etc.... You get the picture.
Admittedly, not all the ads are like this, but it's discouraging to read these ads because you’re not perfect. Who is?
I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with wanting a certain type but when you get too specific, it takes the fun out of it. There's no spontaneity.
I have a friend who answered a personal ad. He met this women at her house. This lady, (whom I believe was unemployed), had the nerve to say to my friend that he would have to work three jobs to support her and her kids. That takes a lot of nerve to say to someone you just met. If she had the decency to tell him all this in her ad or on the phone. He would have said "Forget it!"
Since some of these women who place ads are looking for perfection, I would like to place my own ad looking for perfection. Here it is: SWM ISO the perfect women. MUST be in great shape (athletic build—can't be overweight in the least bit), MUST have their real hair (no wigs, weaves), MUST be their natural color (not bleached, streaked, frosted, highlight¬ed in any way, shape or form), MUST have their real teeth (no caps, bridge work, etc....), MUST be financially secure (a high-paying job, no welfare or government assistance), MUST be a doctor, lawyer or a CEO of a big company or any related big money-making position, MUST like to spend money (especially on me), MUST have no kids whatsoever, MUST have their own place (preferably a house), MUST be materialistic and superficial. Will only respond to women who meet this criteria (or similar qualities). How many responses would this ad solicit? Very few if any at all. And if I did get responses, it would be from women responding to put me in my place.
Demanding perfection in a potential partner makes it harder for everyone to meet anyone. In seeking a soul mate, why do we put so much emphasis on looks and material possessions? Go into it with an open mind and have a good time. If you're too picky, you'll never find what you're really looking for, someone who loves and respects you for who you are and appreciates your unique qualities.
There's nothing wrong with wanting certain qualities, but let's not go overboard.
I knew someone who was very, very picky. He would not even look at a girl unless she was "exceptionally thin" because he liked the anorexic model type. If the woman couldn't hide behind a piece of dental floss—forget it! When he finally stopped being so picky, he found a compatible woman, who couldn't hide behind a piece of dental floss, and is now happily married. Certainly, he was surprised to find what he wanted in the most unlikely package. And so can you if you don't have anything too specific in mind.
Women say they don't want anyone who plays games but they're the ones playing the games: chasing them, leaving messages, no return phone calls. You get the picture. And they wonder why they're alone or haven't found the right type. That's because they don't give a guy the chance to get to know them and that's because they don't answer the responses to their ads. Stretching the truth or all-out lying is part of the territory in personal ads because now they are online. It's just a bunch of words on a website and a photo. Whether or not the photo is of them or what they really look like, presently, and not many years ago, is debatable.
One time, I answered an ad and the lady said she was a certain age, didn't say anything about having children, and was voluptuous but not overweight. When I talked to her, she slowly revealed the opposing truth. I finally met her in person. Yes, she was overweight but that wasn't a problem, the fact that she lied to me was a problem. I mean the ad was deceiving, she lied from the get go. Not only that, initially, I had to call her repeatedly before she called me back.
If you're going to place a personal ad, shouldn't you be as honest as possible for the best response? If you're overweight then maybe you should put that in your ad as well as if you have children, your height, if you're a smoker or a drinker. If you do that, being honest, I mean, no one will be discouraged.
Certainly, it's disappointing when you read these ads and you can't answer them, because you can't measure up to the strict requirements. Few of us can. Lying only gets the wrong response. Honesty keeps those from responding who aren't interested in someone with children, is overweight, smokes, drinks, etc., and those who are do respond.
Personal ads requiring perfection are doomed from the onset. Here's an example: MUST have a full head of hair (which I do not have), MUST be tall, 5' 11" or taller (I'm only 5'6"), MUST be muscular, athletic, (1 have a slight build), MUST be a doctor, lawyer, policeman (I'm not even close), MUST be between a certain age (I'm either too young or too old), MUST like going to clubs ([ don't like the bar scene at all), MUST be a certain weight, etc.. etc.... You get the picture.
Admittedly, not all the ads are like this, but it's discouraging to read these ads because you’re not perfect. Who is?
I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with wanting a certain type but when you get too specific, it takes the fun out of it. There's no spontaneity.
I have a friend who answered a personal ad. He met this women at her house. This lady, (whom I believe was unemployed), had the nerve to say to my friend that he would have to work three jobs to support her and her kids. That takes a lot of nerve to say to someone you just met. If she had the decency to tell him all this in her ad or on the phone. He would have said "Forget it!"
Since some of these women who place ads are looking for perfection, I would like to place my own ad looking for perfection. Here it is: SWM ISO the perfect women. MUST be in great shape (athletic build—can't be overweight in the least bit), MUST have their real hair (no wigs, weaves), MUST be their natural color (not bleached, streaked, frosted, highlight¬ed in any way, shape or form), MUST have their real teeth (no caps, bridge work, etc....), MUST be financially secure (a high-paying job, no welfare or government assistance), MUST be a doctor, lawyer or a CEO of a big company or any related big money-making position, MUST like to spend money (especially on me), MUST have no kids whatsoever, MUST have their own place (preferably a house), MUST be materialistic and superficial. Will only respond to women who meet this criteria (or similar qualities). How many responses would this ad solicit? Very few if any at all. And if I did get responses, it would be from women responding to put me in my place.
Demanding perfection in a potential partner makes it harder for everyone to meet anyone. In seeking a soul mate, why do we put so much emphasis on looks and material possessions? Go into it with an open mind and have a good time. If you're too picky, you'll never find what you're really looking for, someone who loves and respects you for who you are and appreciates your unique qualities.
There's nothing wrong with wanting certain qualities, but let's not go overboard.
I knew someone who was very, very picky. He would not even look at a girl unless she was "exceptionally thin" because he liked the anorexic model type. If the woman couldn't hide behind a piece of dental floss—forget it! When he finally stopped being so picky, he found a compatible woman, who couldn't hide behind a piece of dental floss, and is now happily married. Certainly, he was surprised to find what he wanted in the most unlikely package. And so can you if you don't have anything too specific in mind.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Food Handling Hygiene by Eddy Dio
Did you ever go into a diner and when the waiter/waitress brings you your food, what do you notice? They have their thumb in your French fries. I didn’t order that, is that going to be extra? You think they could wear one of those food handling gloves. Their hands could have been up their nose, down their pants, in someone else’s food dish when they go to clean the table off. And then you’re eating that. Yummy.
Salad bars are open sores. Someone could have sneezed in there and you’d think it’s guacamole or relish.
Go to a bar and order a tap beer. The bartender submerges the tap into your mug when he/she fills and refills your beer. They do this with everyone else's beer as well. In essence it becomes community beer because you are tasting everyone else's blood (if their gums bleed), saliva, dinner and whatever else they had in their mouths. You might as well take sips from each others beer because it’s the same thing. Notice how bartenders grab empty used glasses off the bar by putting their fingers inside the glass and then puts a straw in your drink or a lime in your Corona with the same fingers. Makes me want to drink it even more.
What about deli’s? What happens when someone accidently cuts their fingers in the slicer? I’m eating finger sandwhiches. But the best is when the person, who just made your sandwhich, gives it to you and you notice the band aid on their finger with the big blood stain on it.
Salad bars are open sores. Someone could have sneezed in there and you’d think it’s guacamole or relish.
Go to a bar and order a tap beer. The bartender submerges the tap into your mug when he/she fills and refills your beer. They do this with everyone else's beer as well. In essence it becomes community beer because you are tasting everyone else's blood (if their gums bleed), saliva, dinner and whatever else they had in their mouths. You might as well take sips from each others beer because it’s the same thing. Notice how bartenders grab empty used glasses off the bar by putting their fingers inside the glass and then puts a straw in your drink or a lime in your Corona with the same fingers. Makes me want to drink it even more.
What about deli’s? What happens when someone accidently cuts their fingers in the slicer? I’m eating finger sandwhiches. But the best is when the person, who just made your sandwhich, gives it to you and you notice the band aid on their finger with the big blood stain on it.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Parental Licensing By Eddy Dio
I was watching two different talk shows at two different times. The topics were the same though. The theme of the shows were women who partied while they were pregnant. These women were smoking cigarettes, doing drugs and drinking alcohol throughout the whole term of their pregnancies and had a firm belief that all this wasn't going to have an effect on their unborn children, that the baby was going to be normal whatsoever. On one talk show they had a woman, 18 years old I believe, via satellite from some particular hospital. She was one of these women who was partying throughout her pregnancy and just gave birth at eight and a half months. The baby was born blue and had to be put in an incubator, I believe. I don't think there was ever an update on the babies condition.
I Have to ask, emphatically, WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE? Didn't anyone ever educate them and tell them that anything they put directly into their bodies may effect their unborn child? Are they going to be able to sit their child down and explain to them that what they did while they were pregnant is why their child is born deformed and born with FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME. Are they going to say " Mommy made a mistake, she was an idiot because she didn't believe the doctors and the facts that said if I do this I may harm my unborn child. Now you are going to have to pay for mommy's mistake for the rest of your life and suffer through it."
What if you wanted to put this baby up for adoption? Do you honestly think that anyone will adopt your mistake? We are supposed to learn from our mistakes not pay for them. To me that's child abuse and attempted murder and should be treated as such. If a woman deliberately abuses a child whether it be born or unborn she should be thrown in jail and ordered to undergo counseling then she might be able to see/or be reunited with her child/children. If she happened to do it again or neglect the child, she should then be thrown in jail for a very long time, where, the opportunity to think about what has transpired is prevalent Furthermore, mandatory sterilization should be part of the sentence.
To me that seems fair enough because if they did this to one child they may do it to another and if they are sterilized, the possibility to produce more children is not present The same goes for the Division of Youth and Family Services, social workers, police officers and anyone who knows about this and doesn't do anything about it. They should be held liable, be fired from their jobs and must do some kind of jail time and/or community service because they are just as guilty.
That is why I think there should be a national law requiring a parental license. In high school and college it would be a mandatory requirement to take a parental licensing program. Even couples who are thinking of becoming parents would have to take this program. It would consist of lectures and demonstrations by experts as well as classes and tests to obtain their license. They would also have to take refresher courses and be retested every three to six months.
This program would educate men and women about birth control, child abuse, the effects of drugs, smoking and alcohol during pregnancy,and places to call and go to in case of an emergency. There would be specially trained authorities, such as
the Division of Youth and Family Services, social workers and police officers who
would make unannounced visits to make sure their isn't any wrong doing going on and that the parents are doing the best to raise their children. If they fail any of
their tests or don't show up for any of their classes they would get points against them.After a certain amount of points they would have their parental licenses
suspended, do community service and pay fines which would go to a children's charity. If there was such a program maybe babies wouldn't be born addicted
to drugs and alcohol, abused or dumped in garbage cans. Being a parent is the same as having a driver's license. They're both privileges, not obligations.
I Have to ask, emphatically, WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE? Didn't anyone ever educate them and tell them that anything they put directly into their bodies may effect their unborn child? Are they going to be able to sit their child down and explain to them that what they did while they were pregnant is why their child is born deformed and born with FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME. Are they going to say " Mommy made a mistake, she was an idiot because she didn't believe the doctors and the facts that said if I do this I may harm my unborn child. Now you are going to have to pay for mommy's mistake for the rest of your life and suffer through it."
What if you wanted to put this baby up for adoption? Do you honestly think that anyone will adopt your mistake? We are supposed to learn from our mistakes not pay for them. To me that's child abuse and attempted murder and should be treated as such. If a woman deliberately abuses a child whether it be born or unborn she should be thrown in jail and ordered to undergo counseling then she might be able to see/or be reunited with her child/children. If she happened to do it again or neglect the child, she should then be thrown in jail for a very long time, where, the opportunity to think about what has transpired is prevalent Furthermore, mandatory sterilization should be part of the sentence.
To me that seems fair enough because if they did this to one child they may do it to another and if they are sterilized, the possibility to produce more children is not present The same goes for the Division of Youth and Family Services, social workers, police officers and anyone who knows about this and doesn't do anything about it. They should be held liable, be fired from their jobs and must do some kind of jail time and/or community service because they are just as guilty.
That is why I think there should be a national law requiring a parental license. In high school and college it would be a mandatory requirement to take a parental licensing program. Even couples who are thinking of becoming parents would have to take this program. It would consist of lectures and demonstrations by experts as well as classes and tests to obtain their license. They would also have to take refresher courses and be retested every three to six months.
This program would educate men and women about birth control, child abuse, the effects of drugs, smoking and alcohol during pregnancy,and places to call and go to in case of an emergency. There would be specially trained authorities, such as
the Division of Youth and Family Services, social workers and police officers who
would make unannounced visits to make sure their isn't any wrong doing going on and that the parents are doing the best to raise their children. If they fail any of
their tests or don't show up for any of their classes they would get points against them.After a certain amount of points they would have their parental licenses
suspended, do community service and pay fines which would go to a children's charity. If there was such a program maybe babies wouldn't be born addicted
to drugs and alcohol, abused or dumped in garbage cans. Being a parent is the same as having a driver's license. They're both privileges, not obligations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)